Provoking the Muse

Ducunt volentem fata, nolentem trahunt.

Is this Atlantis?

I’m skeptical. It’s been a while since I read Plato’s account of Atlantis, but I could have sworn that he said the city was round.

Also, on a philosophic level, the dialog in which the myth of Atlantis is happens to be the sequel to The Republic, meaning you have to consider the dramatic implications of its inclusion. Most people don’t, and just assume it’s a real place.

In other words, I don’t really think there is such a thing as “Atlantis.” But what do I know?

Filed under: Amazing, Classics, Cool Picture, Current Events, Greek, History, Philosophy

Spe Salvi

His Holiness’ newest encyclical is here! A taste:

“SPE SALVI facti sumus”—in hope we were saved, says Saint Paul to the Romans, and likewise to us (Rom 8:24). According to the Christian faith, “redemption”—salvation—is not simply a given. Redemption is offered to us in the sense that we have been given hope, trustworthy hope, by virtue of which we can face our present: the present, even if it is arduous, can be lived and accepted if it leads towards a goal, if we can be sure of this goal, and if this goal is great enough to justify the effort of the journey.

Warning: Papist awesomeness ahead.

Filed under: Catholic, Classics, Current Events, Education, Greek, History, Latin, Philosophy, Religion

Imus, Nifong Meet Their Match in God Nemesis

VDH:

In the past week, Don Imus was fired, all charges against the Duke University lacrosse players were dropped, and almost everyone has offered a sermon about the racial and class issues involved in both cases. But we need look only to the Ancient Greeks for the best insight.

The Greeks believed that insolence naturally leads to bullying, or hubris. This arrogance induces a mad behavior called ate. Finally, that recklessness earns well-earned destruction unleashed by the god Nemesis.

In other words, what goes around comes around – big time.

So, is he saying it’s all Greek to everyone?! Seriously, interesting article, as always, from VDH.

Filed under: Classics, Current Events, Greek, Politics

Go Tell The Spartans

Andres over at the LIBERTAS movie blog has some thoughts about what an excellent movie 300 is, especially compared to the most recent “Best Picture” movies. He then uses this as a launching point for a bleg on the baby boomers:

They are a weary failure of a generation. Like the British Edwardians before them, they could not live up to the achievements of their elders. So they invented a new set of rules, rules that sounded daring and dangerous and radical, but are in fact puerile, safe and anesthetic. Does western civilization require defense and sacrifice? Well, then ho, ho, ho, western civ has got to go. Does political freedom require responsibility and self-discipline? Well, then we’ll redefine freedom as individual licentiousness. Do other, lesser cultures want to destroy us? Well, then, we’ll join them in blaming America and avoid any unpleasantness. In short, the baby boomers’ leftist philosophy amounts to nothing more than an elaborate rationalization of their own cowardice and a way to dull the pain of the resultant self-disgust.

Ouch.

Filed under: Classics, Current Events, Greek, Movies, Politics

Hollywood vs. Iran

FRED DALTON THOMPSON reviews 300.

UPDATE: And he’s at Pajamas Media as well.

Filed under: America, Classics, Current Events, Election 2008, Fred D. Thompson, Greek, Movies, Politics

From Achilles to Zeus

A classical education, movie-style!

Filed under: Classics, Funny, Greek, Latin, Movies

Director Zach Snyder Does 30 on ‘300′

Filed under: Classics, Current Events, Greek, Movies

Knew this was coming

Filed under: Classics, Greek, Movies, Politics, Religion

PtM at the Movies: 300

What’s your favorite movie, and why? For me, it’s The Alamo, the original, with John Wayne and his cast of hundreds, because of the absolute sense of duty in the face of tyranny. 300, as you might imagine, fits that bill nicely.

Let’s get one thing straight before we talk about this movie: it’s not historically accurate. It’s based on a comic book. Which was based on the classic The 300 Spartans, also about this famous battle. If you want the historical view of the battle, read Herodotus. If you want to see a movie that treats honor and duty as serious concepts, then go see 300.

Let me tell you what this movie is: an unapologetic movie about duty and honor in the face of tyranny. Leonidas, the king of Sparta (played perfectly by Gerard Butler), knows that the tribute the Persian messenger demands would not be the end; appeasement of a tyrant (especially one who thinks he’s a god) never works. The act of killing the messenger (a huge blasphemy in Greece, even for Spartans, that ran afoul Zeus himself) might be imprudent, but it also indicates the truth that there is no negotiation with tyrants.

Honor and duty (and glory) are probably the most spoken words in the movie. Leonidas knows he has no choice but to face the enemy at the Fire Gates, to stem the tide and hope that his people will realize the threat; it is his duty. Certainly, he wants to achieve glory in battle, he wants to be honored for his heroics, and that drives him as well; but it is clear that honor is only gained in service to Sparta. So, he fights.

Why 300 men? Well, historically, each king of Sparta (there were actually two, and they were elected) was entitled to a bodyguard of 300 men, under his direct command. So, when the Council refused to send the Spartan Army, Leonidas was well within his right to take his 300 and leave. Again, perhaps imprudent, but a necessary action. So, 300 men (with a few allies, who eventually leave) stand and fight against millions. For glory, for honor, for Sparta, for freedom. It boggles the mind.

The movie is not always serious; there are some amusing moments. We all know the famous Spartan one-liners (where did you think the word “laconic” came from?), including my favorite (“Then we will fight in the shade!”). There is also a funny scene where a Spartan starts laughing when he sees the millions of the Persian army. When a non-Spartan (Theban, I think) asks why he’s laughing, he tells him that he might finally fight someone who could kill him in battle. You laugh at his remark and his attitude, but it is a little off-putting, to say the least. Another amusing moment occurs after the first battle; Xerxes demands (he never asks) to see Leonidas (after the 300 Spartans killed thousands of Persians). When his officers warn him from going to negotiate, standing amidst the thousands of dead, Leonidas states, “there’s no reason we can’t be civil!” Humorous, yes, but also a lesson: even the warrior king, raised to consider death in battle as the only true way to die, is willing to end to speak to his opponent.

Again, I liked this movie because it took seriously the notions of honor and duty. You never submit to tyrants, and you protect what you should hold dear (country and family) at all costs. It’s been a while since Hollywood has made a movie like that (most war movies nowadays, as far as I can tell, are about trying to get out of harm’s way, duty and honor be damned), and it’s absolutely wonderful. This is perhaps the one time that I hope a movie has a serious impact upon our pop culture; honor and duty are forgotten notions, and the boys of this generation could stand to re-learn what out ancestors held so dear.

And if you still aren’t convinced that this movie is awesome and that you need to go see it, it’s broken the record for box office earnings during the month of March. In the market is truth.

Filed under: Classics, Greek, Movies, Politics

SPARTANS!

LIBERTAS has one heck of a review of 300. I’ll be seeing it some time next week, and will of course have a PtM At the Movies review (I think it’s been a while for that…).

Meanwhile, read this to hold you over. =)

UPDATE: The politics of 300, and some special effects magic!

Filed under: Classics, Greek, Movies

Fighting in the Shade

Filed under: Classics, Current Events, Entertainment, Greek, Movies, Politics

Socratic Tradition and the Death of Jesus

Brandon Wason:

So what does this all mean? What advantage would it be for Luke to use Socratic tradition in his work? Socrates was the paradigmatic martyr of the Greco-Roman world, and so Luke was presenting Jesus’ death as a noble act, not one of defeat.

I know a number of people at UD who would be quite upset to learn that someone was comparing Socrates to Christ: Reason on this side, Revelation on that side, and ne’er the twain shall meet.

Filed under: Catholic, Classics, Greek, Philosophy, The West

Makes me feel better

300, VDH approved:

But most importantly, 300 preserves the spirit of the Thermopylae story. The Spartans, quoting lines known from Herodotus and themes from the lyric poets, profess unswerving loyalty to a free Greece. They will never kow-tow to the Persians, preferring to die on their feet than live on their knees.

If critics think that 300 reduces and simplifies the meaning of Thermopylae into freedom versus tyranny, they should reread carefully ancient accounts and then blame Herodotus, Plutarch, and Diodorus — who long ago boasted that Greek freedom was on trial against Persian autocracy, free men in superior fashion dying for their liberty, their enslaved enemies being whipped to enslave others.

Filed under: Classics, Greek, History, Movies, Politics

Sounds about right…

Some advice:

If in the future I ever meet a philosopher while I am walking on the road, even by chance, I will turn round and get out of his way as if he were a mad dog.

Heh.

Filed under: Classics, Greek, Philosophy, Quotes

Contact Denis

Email: deambrosejr [at] gmail [dot] com
AIM: friarmarley
Google Talk: deambrosejr [at] gmail [dot] com
Yahoo!: deambrosejr
MSN: denis_ambrose [at] hotmail [dot] com
Facebook: Denis Ambrose

Begging

My Amazon.com Wish List

Twitter

Visitors

  • 44,328 hits

 

November 2009
S M T W T F S
« Oct    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930